locks on object "xp_startmail"

Hy,
recently I got a problem with locks on my sql server 2000
SP3. I took a trace and I could see that there are a lot
of lock timeout (sometimes deadlock, but not regularly)
when the load is heavy on the sql server machine.
I took a trace and tryed to understand the trace result,
and I found that almost always the lock were on an
objectid (309576141) not corresponding to a table or an
index but to a store procedure : xp_sendmail ! I was very
astonished because this seems to be a procedure for
sending mail (I'm not sending any mail in my sql server
application). Moreover the SPID timing out is often a
task manager process.
Now, I would like to know why I can't see the real object
on which the process is timed out OR if this kind of lock
hides some other problems I'd better face.
Many thanks for any kind of suggestion.
cristinaSorry for the basic question, but did you check for the object id in the correct database?
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"cris" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:1fe201c44a4b$32290c10$7d02280a@.phx.gbl...
> Hy,
> recently I got a problem with locks on my sql server 2000
> SP3. I took a trace and I could see that there are a lot
> of lock timeout (sometimes deadlock, but not regularly)
> when the load is heavy on the sql server machine.
> I took a trace and tryed to understand the trace result,
> and I found that almost always the lock were on an
> objectid (309576141) not corresponding to a table or an
> index but to a store procedure : xp_sendmail ! I was very
> astonished because this seems to be a procedure for
> sending mail (I'm not sending any mail in my sql server
> application). Moreover the SPID timing out is often a
> task manager process.
> Now, I would like to know why I can't see the real object
> on which the process is timed out OR if this kind of lock
> hides some other problems I'd better face.
> Many thanks for any kind of suggestion.
> cristina|||Thankyou very much for your suggestion!
I feel very ashamed about my error. I was checking in the 'master' database
Escuse me, but I made a blunder, and without your help I couldn't get out of this error..